Comparative Analysis of Biomaterials Used in Dental Implants: Osseointegration,Biocompatibility, and Clinical Performance
Comparative Analysis of Biomaterials Used in Dental Implants: Osseointegration,Biocompatibility, and Clinical Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v2i2.2022.1085Keywords:
Biomaterials; Dental implants; Titanium; Zirconia; Osseointegration; Biocompatibility.Abstract
This article presents a comparative analysis of the main biomaterials used in dental
implants, highlighting their properties related to osseointegration, biocompatibility, and
clinical performance. Classic materials such as titanium and its alloys are discussed, as well
as emerging alternatives like zirconia. Based on a critical review of recent scientific studies,
the article examines the interaction between these biomaterials and bone tissue, their
immunological responses, and clinical implications. The study emphasizes the role of surface
modifications and technological advancements in optimizing outcomes in implant dentistry.
The presented data aim to support evidence-based decision-making in the selection of the most
appropriate material for contemporary clinical practice.
Downloads
References
ALBREKTSSON, T. et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review
and proposed criteria of success. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, v. 1,
n. 1, p. 11-25, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-7058/25/08/20
ANSELME, K. et al. The interaction of cells and bacteria with surfaces structured at the
nanometre scale. Acta Biomaterialia, v. 6, n. 10, p. 3824-3846, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.001
BUSER, D. et al. Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 10-
year prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clinical Oral Implants Research, v. 28,
n. 6, p. 654-661, 2017.
CHEN, Q. et al. Modulation of macrophage polarization by nanotopography for bone
regeneration. Acta Biomaterialia, v. 51, p. 269-282, 2017.
ELIAS, C. N. et al. Titanium alloys for biomedical applications. Journal of the Mechanical
Behavior of Biomedical Materials, v. 7, p. 58-71, 2013.
GEETHA, M. et al. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants – A
review. Progress in Materials Science, v. 54, n. 3, p. 397-425, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.06.004
HALLAB, N. J. et al. Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants. Biomaterials, v.
, n. 23, p. 3053-3063, 2001.
KOHAL, R. J. et al. Clinical outcomes of zirconia dental implants: a systematic review.
International Journal of Implant Dentistry, v. 6, n. 2, p. 13-27, 2020.
LIU, X. et al. Advances in surface modification of titanium implants. Journal ofMaterials
Science: Materials in Medicine, v. 30, n. 7, p. 75-87, 2019.
NIINOMI, M. Mechanical properties of biomedical titanium alloys. Materials Science and
Engineering A, v. 243, n. 1-2, p. 231-236, 2008.
OSMAN, R. B. et al. The future of dental implants: a review on recent trends, advances, and
future perspectives. Journal of Dentistry, v. 92, p. 103260, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103260
RUPP, F. et al. Surface characteristics of titanium dental implants and their biological
interactions. Materials Science and Engineering C, v. 90, p. 670-683, 2018.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Louise Souza Coelho, Júlia Dal Paz (Autor)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.