Scenario Planning for the Resilience of U.S. Supply Chains: Modeling the Impacts of Geopolitical Disruptions and Freight Cost Volatility

Scenario Planning for the Resilience of U.S. Supply Chains: Modeling the Impacts of Geopolitical Disruptions and Freight Cost Volatility

Authors

  • Ivan de Matos Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i1.2025.1420

Keywords:

scenario planning; resilience; freight costs; geopolitics; TTS/TTR; United States.

Abstract

This article examines the use of scenario planning as a decision-making tool to strengthen the resilience of U.S. supply chains in the face of geopolitical disruptions such as sanctions, conflicts, embargoes, and regulatory shocks, as well as the volatility of freight costs across ocean, rail, road, and air transport. The research integrates the operations and risk literature with strategic intelligence practices, proposing a method that connects plausible narratives to quantitative models—discrete event simulation, system dynamics, and Monte Carlo—generating metrics for TTS/TTR, OTIF, Operational VaR, and avoided loss under different trajectories. It argues that the usefulness of scenarios is enhanced when linked to signposts and decision triggers, which activate contractual optionalities, structural buffers, and multi-gateway rerouting. Evidence from sector reports and public policies, such as the National Freight Strategic Plan (USDOT), indicates that the combination of modular architecture, inter-organizational data, and contracts with options contributes to reducing the area of ​​the “resilience triangle” and protecting margins in shock contexts (SHEFFI, 2015; CHOPRA; MEINDL, 2016; USDOT, 2020; UNCTAD, 2020; SEA-INTELLIGENCE, 2021).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ivan de Matos

    Formado em Logística, pelo Centro Universitário Leonardo Da Vinci
    Pós-graduado em Administração de Pessoas, pelo Centro Universitário Leonardo da Vinci

References

CHOPRA, S.; MEINDL, P. Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation. 6. ed. Boston: Pearson, 2016.

CHRISTOPHER, M. Logistics & Supply Chain Management. 5. ed. Harlow: Pearson, 2016.

CLARKSONS RESEARCH. Container Intelligence Quarterly. London: Clarksons Research, 2021.

DREWRY. Container Forecaster. London: Drewry Maritime Research, 2021.

EIA – U.S. ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION. Short-Term Energy Outlook. Washington, DC: EIA, 2021.

HARALAMBIDES, H. E. Gigantism in container shipping, ports and global logistics: a time-lapse into the future. Maritime Economics & Logistics, v. 21, p. 1–60, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-018-00116-0

IAPH – INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PORTS AND HARBORS. COVID-19 Port Economic Impact Barometer. Antwerp: IAPH, 2020.

ISO. ISO 22301:2019 — Security and Resilience — Business Continuity Management Systems — Requirements. Genebra: ISO, 2019.

IVANOV, D.; DOLGUI, A. Viability of intertwined supply networks: extending the supply chain resilience angles. International Journal of Production Research, v. 58, n. 10, p. 2904–2915, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1750727

NOTTEBOOM, T.; PALLIS, A. Port Economics, Management and Policy: COVID-19 and the Impact on Ports. Relatórios/briefs, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429318184

NOTTEBOOM, T.; RODRIGUE, J.-P. Port congestion and the destabilization of supply chains in 2020/2021. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2021.

OECD/ITF – INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT FORUM. Policies to Enhance Intermodal Connectivity and Performance. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2016.

PONOMAROV, S. Y.; HOLCOMB, M. C. Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, v. 20, n. 1, p. 124–143, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090910954873

RODRIGUE, J.-P. The Geography of Transport Systems. 4. ed. New York: Routledge, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429346323

SCHOEMAKER, P. J. H. Scenario planning: a tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Management Review, v. 36, n. 2, p. 25–40, 1995.

SEA-INTELLIGENCE MARITIME ANALYSIS. Global Liner Performance (GLP) Report. Copenhagen: Sea-Intelligence, 2021.

SHEFFI, Y. The Power of Resilience: How the Best Companies Manage the Unexpected. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262029797.001.0001

SIMCHI-LEVI, D.; KAMINSKY, P.; SIMCHI-LEVI, E. Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts, Strategies and Case Studies. 3. ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2008.

UNCTAD – UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT. Review of Maritime Transport 2020. Geneva: UNCTAD, 2020.

USDOT – UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. National Freight Strategic Plan. Washington, DC: USDOT, 2020.

WACK, P. Scenarios: Shooting the rapids. Harvard Business Review, v. 63, n. 6, p. 139–150, 1985.

WORLD BANK; IHS MARKIT. Container Port Performance Index 2020. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2020.

Published

2025-01-25

How to Cite

MATOS, Ivan de. Scenario Planning for the Resilience of U.S. Supply Chains: Modeling the Impacts of Geopolitical Disruptions and Freight Cost Volatility: Scenario Planning for the Resilience of U.S. Supply Chains: Modeling the Impacts of Geopolitical Disruptions and Freight Cost Volatility. Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal The Knowledge, Brasil, v. 1, n. 1, 2025. DOI: 10.51473/rcmos.v1i1.2025.1420. Disponível em: https://submissoesrevistarcmos.com.br/rcmos/article/view/1420. Acesso em: 6 oct. 2025.