Monte Carlo Methods for Uncertainty and Risk Assessment: A Methodological Review Across Engineering and Applied Statistics
Métodos de Monte Carlo para Avaliação de Incerteza e Risco: Uma Revisão Metodológica em Engenharia e Estatística Aplicada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i1.2026.2031Keywords:
Monte Carlo simulation, Uncertainty quantification, Risk analysisAbstract
This paper presents a methodological review of the Monte Carlo method as a toolkit for uncertainty analysis in engineering and applied statistical problems and systems. Monte Carlo simulation has become one of the most universal stochastic tools for analyzing systems subject to variability, incomplete information, and complex probabilistic dependencies. Drawing on 24 representative studies published between 1989 and 2025, this review examines the method’s fundamental principles, typical implementation workflows, and its broad spectrum of applications from structural reliability to financial evaluation. Particular attention is given to the advantages that explain its widespread adoption—flexibility, interpretability, and robustness under nonlinear and multidimensional settings—as well as to the limitations that constrain its reliability, including slow convergence, dependence on accurate input distributions, and computational costs. The review also highlights recent methodological advances that address these issues, such as hybrid frameworks combining Monte Carlo sampling with machine learning or intelligent variance reduction. Overall, the paper provides a consolidated view of how Monte Carlo methods contribute to engineering decision support and discusses future research directions toward more efficient and integrated stochastic analysis.
Downloads
References
BAMER, F.; THALER, D.; STOFFEL, M.; MARKERT, B. A Monte Carlo simulation approach in non-linear structural dynamics using convolutional neural networks. Frontiers in Built Environment, v. 7, p. 679488, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2021.679488.
BARAKAT, M. J.; BERSSANETI, F. T. Applicability of the Monte Carlo simulation method for deadline prediction in a pharmaceutical technology transfer project. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE ENGENHARIA DE PRODUÇÃO (ENEGEP), 36., 2016, João Pessoa. Proceedings… João Pessoa: ABEPRO, 2016. Available at: https://abepro.org.br/biblioteca/TN_STP_227_325_29916.pdf.
BLANCHETT, D. M.; PFAU, W. D. The power and limitations of Monte Carlo simulations. Portfolio Construction Forum, 2016. Available at: https://obj.portfolioconstructionforum.edu.au/articles_perspectives/PortfolioConstruction-Forum_Pfau_The-power-and-limitations-of-Monte-Carlo-simulations.pdf.
CASAROTTO FILHO, N.; KOPITTKE, B. H. Investment analysis: financial mathematics, engineering economics, decision-making, business strategy. 10. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2007.
CRUNDWELL, F. K. Finance for engineers: evaluation and funding of capital projects. London: Springer, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-033-9.
CVETANOSKA, V.; STOJANOVSKI, T. Using high performance computing and Monte Carlo simulation for pricing American options. arXiv, 2012. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.0106.
GLASSERMAN, P. Monte Carlo methods in financial engineering. New York: Springer, 2004.
GUO, H.; LUO, C.; ZHU, S.-P.; YOU, X.; YAN, M.; LIU, X. Machine learning-based enhanced Monte Carlo simulation for low failure probability structural reliability analysis. Structures, v. 74, art. 108530, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2025.108530.
HAYSE, J. Using Monte Carlo analysis in ecological risk assessments. Environmental Practice, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1–10, 2000.
KHAN, Z. A.; SIDDIQUEE, A. N.; KUMAR, B.; ABIDI, M. H. Principles of engineering economics with applications. 2. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
KREMLJAK, Z.; KAFOL, C. Types of risk in a system engineering environment and software tools for risk analysis. WSEAS Transactions on Systems, v. 6, n. 1, p. 175–182, 2007.
LOASE, J. F.; SHEEHAN, T. Dependent random variables and hypothesis testing—A Monte Carlo perspective. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, v. 17, n. 3–4, p. 563–571, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-1221(89)90074-1.
NASSER, R. B. McCloud service framework: architecture for developing Monte Carlo simulation-based cloud services. 2012. Master’s thesis – Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2012.
SOBOL, I. M. A primer for the Monte Carlo method. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1994.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. Guiding principles for Monte Carlo analysis. EPA/630/R-97/001. Washington, DC: Risk Assessment Forum, 1997. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-11/documents/montecar.pdf.
VAN DER VEEN, A. M.; COX, M. G. Getting started with uncertainty evaluation using the Monte Carlo method in R. Accreditation and Quality Assurance, v. 26, n. 3, p. 129–141, 2021.
WAGENER, T.; KOLLAT, J. Numerical and visual evaluation of hydrological and environmental models using the Monte Carlo analysis toolbox (MCAT). Environmental Modelling & Software, v. 22, n. 7, p. 1021–1033, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.06.017.
WANG, H.; JULIER, S. J. Reducing the computational cost of a Monte Carlo-based planning algorithm. In: IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION (ICRA), 2013. Proceedings… Piscataway: IEEE, 2013. p. 2419–2426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRA.2013.6722377.
WILSON, G. et al. Best practices for scientific computing. PLOS Biology, v. 12, n. 1, e1001745, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001745
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dennis Alonso Sanchez Clavijo (Autor)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


