Architecture of neurosurgical proficiency: the integration of neuroradiology, simulation biomaterials (phantoms), and data science in the reduction of iatrogenic morbidity
Architecture of neurosurgical proficiency: the integration of neuroradiology, simulation biomaterials (phantoms), and data science in the reduction of iatrogenic morbidity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i2.2025.2180Keywords:
Neurosurgery. Neuroradiology. Phantoms. Cognitive Ergonomics. Health Economics.Abstract
The technological transition of 21st-century operative medicine has imposed a demand for spatial precision on neurosurgery that precludes the maintenance of classical patient-based teaching methods. This article proposes a biomedical investigation into the modernization of training in spinal surgeries and endovascular interventions. The methodology is based on a literature review in neuroanatomy, synthetic polymer physics, medical education sciences, and health economics. The study is divided into seven content axes, in addition to a clinical case study, dissecting the biomechanics of tubulares approaches, the hemodynamics of neuroradiology, the neurobiology of chronic pain, the additive manufacturing of Phantoms, the algorithmic metrification of surgical competence, cognitive ergonomics, and the financial impact on the North American market. The literature indicates that hyper-realistic simulation transfers the learning curve from the operating room to the laboratory, mitigating complications such as cerebrospinais fluid leaks and ischemic injuries. It is concluded that training based on high-fidelity physical simulation is a bioethical and financial imperative, essential for maintaining patient safety.
Downloads
References
BADALAMENTE, M. A. et al. Haptic feedback in surgical simulation: the impact on skill acquisition and transfer. Journal of Surgical Education, v. 68, n. 6, p. 556-563, 2011.
CALLAHAN, A. B. et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) for surgical residents. Surgery, v. 122, n. 4, p. 597-604, 1997.
CHOWDHURY, S. et al. 3D printing and patient-specific phantoms in spine surgery. Spine, v. 45, n. 12, p. E721-E728, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003381
ERICSSON, K. A. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Academic Medicine, v. 79, n. 10, p. S70-S81, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022
FOLEY, K. T.; SMITH, M. M. Microendoscopic discectomy. Techniques in Neurosurgery, v. 3, p. 301-307, 1997.
GALLAGHER, A. G. et al. Virtual reality training for the operating room and cardiac catheterisation laboratory. The Lancet, v. 364, n. 9444, p. 1538-1540, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17278-4
MAKARY, M. A.; DANIEL, M. Medical error: the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ, v. 353, i2139, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i2139
MOLYNEUX, A. et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. The Lancet, v. 360, n. 9342, p. 1267-1274, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11314-6
REZNICK, R. K.; MACRAE, H. Teaching surgical skills: changes in the wind. New England Journal of Medicine, v. 355, n. 25, p. 2664-2669, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra054785
SCHELLENBERG, F. et al. Hemodynamic principles in endovascular interventions. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, v. 7, n. 3, p. 210-216, 2015.
STEFANUTTI, F. et al. Chronic post-surgical pain: pathophysiology and prevention. European Journal of Pain, v. 21, n. 5, p. 770-781, 2017.
SWELLER, J. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Science, v. 12, n. 2, p. 257-285, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Salassiê Antonio Mansur (Autor)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

