Treatment of Congenital Clubfoot with the Ponseti Method: A Case Series in Pediatric Patients

Treatment of Congenital Clubfoot with the Ponseti Method: A Case Series in Pediatric Patients

Authors

  • Gabriel Aguiar Rocha Universidade de Rio Verde – Campus Goianésia Author
  • Luiz Fernando Rocha Luz Ferreira Instituto Presidente Antônio Carlos – Porto Nacional Author
  • Revaldo Afonso Silva Junior Centro Universitário de Mineiros (UNIFIMES) Author
  • João Henrique Meneses Xavier Universidade de Rio Verde - campus Aparecida Author
  • Juliano Bernadelli Guerra Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA) Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i1.2026.2233

Keywords:

Clubfoot, Congenital Abnormalities, Manipulation

Abstract

Congenital clubfoot is a common deformity that can compromise motor function when not treated properly. The Ponseti method is currently the conservative treatment of choice, showing high success rates. In this context, this study aims to analyze the clinical and functional evolution of four pediatric patients diagnosed with congenital clubfoot who underwent treatment with the Ponseti method. A descriptive, observational case series is presented involving four newborns diagnosed with idiopathic congenital clubfoot who were treated at the Orthopedics service of a public hospital in Brasília. The patients underwent correction using the Ponseti method, with serial manipulations, plaster immobilization, and tenotomy when indicated. Three female and one male patients were analyzed. Treatment began at 11 days of age, at six weeks, or in the first weeks of life. Two patients presented with bilateral deformity and two with unilateral left deformity. The number of weeks of plaster casting ranged from 5 to 11, with progressive correction through manipulations and serial changes to plaster casts. Percutaneous tenotomy of the Achilles tendon was performed in all cases between the fifth and twelfth week. No treatment-related complications occurred. The case series reinforces the efficacy and safety of the Ponseti method, demonstrating satisfactory deformity correction. The variability in casting time and tenotomy timing highlights the need for individualized treatment and systematic follow-up to prevent recurrence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Gabriel Aguiar Rocha, Universidade de Rio Verde – Campus Goianésia

    Graduado em Medicina pela Universidade de Rio Verde – Campus Goianésia
    Universidade de Rio Verde – campus Goianésia
    Goianésia - Goiás, Brasil

  • Luiz Fernando Rocha Luz Ferreira, Instituto Presidente Antônio Carlos – Porto Nacional

    Graduado em Medicina pelo Instituto Presidente Antônio Carlos – Porto Nacional
    Instituto Presidente Antônio Carlos – Porto Nacional
    Porto Nacional – Tocantins, Brasil

  • Revaldo Afonso Silva Junior, Centro Universitário de Mineiros (UNIFIMES)

    Graduado em Medicina pelo Centro Universitário de Mineiros (UNIFIMES)
    Centro Universitário de Mineiros (UNIFIMES)
    Mineiros – Goiás, Brasil

  • João Henrique Meneses Xavier, Universidade de Rio Verde - campus Aparecida

    Graduado em Medicina pela Universidade de Rio Verde - campus Aparecida
    Universidade de Rio Verde - campus Aparecida
    Goiânia - Goiás, Brasil

  • Juliano Bernadelli Guerra, Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)

    Graduado em Medicina pela Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA)
    Universidade Federal do Pará
    Belém - Pará, Brasil

References

Maghfuri HB, Alshareef AA, Alshareef A. The efficacy of the Ponseti method in the management of clubfoot: a systematic review. Cureus. 2024;16(1).

Smythe T, et al. Global clubfoot treatment in 2023: an overview of advances and outcomes. BMJ Glob Health. 2025;10(3).

Cordeiro FG, Moraes FB, Pires RES, et al. Congenital clubfoot—Is the Ponseti method the definitive solution? Rev Bras Ortop. 2022;56:683-688.

Dreise M, et al. Exploring bracing adherence in Ponseti treatment of clubfoot: a comparative study of factors and outcomes in Uganda. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(14):6396.

Manzoor S, et al. Factors responsible for dropout in the Ponseti method of clubfoot treatment: a cross-sectional study. Qatar Med J. 2024;2024(4):63.

Cady RB, Hennessey TA, Schwend RM. Diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic congenital clubfoot. Pediatrics. 2022;149(2):e2021055555.

Kiani SN, et al. Clubfoot and the Ponseti method: a bibliometric analysis. JBJS Open Access. 2023;8(3):e23.

Raslan EE, et al. Kite versus Ponseti method in the treatment of idiopathic congenital clubfoot: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. 2024;16(6).

Pigeolet M, et al. The impact of socio-economic factors on parental non-adherence to the Ponseti protocol for clubfoot treatment in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;48.

Doski J. When does brace noncompliance occur in patients with clubfoot deformity? Clin Orthop Surg. 2025;17(6):1070.

Taille E, Gauzy JS, Noirot MG. Idiopathic clubfoot treatment and heterogeneity of current therapeutic strategies: the Ponseti method versus the French functional method. Arch Pediatr. 2021;28(5):422-428.

Noonan SO, et al. Ponseti clubfoot casting: factors that affect trainee competency. JAAOS Glob Res Rev. 2022;6(2):e22.

Chen SN, Richards BS, Faulks S, et al. Prospective randomized Ponseti treatment for clubfoot: orthopedic surgeons versus physical therapists. J Pediatr Orthop. 2023;43(2):e93-e99.

Rangasamy K, et al. Techniques, anesthesia preferences, and outcomes of Achilles tenotomy during Ponseti method of idiopathic clubfoot correction: a systematic review. Foot (Edinb). 2022;52:101922.

Sharma S, et al. Factors predictive of tenotomy after Ponseti casting for idiopathic clubfoot: a tertiary care center study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2023;43(3):174-176.

Ghanem I, Saab R, Aouad D, et al. Achilles tenotomy during Ponseti’s clubfoot treatment: better early than late. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2024;33(3):251-257.

Ishizuka T, Schultz M, Van Bosse HJ, et al. Ponseti idiopathic and non-idiopathic clubfoot correction with secondary surgeries. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021;60(4):742-746.

Gelfer Y, Wientroub S, Hughes J, et al. The Core Outcome Clubfoot (CoCo) study: relapse, with poorer clinical and quality of life outcomes, affects 37% of idiopathic clubfoot patients: an international multicentre observational study. Bone Joint J. 2024;106(7):735-743.

Published

2026-04-14

How to Cite

ROCHA, Gabriel Aguiar; FERREIRA, Luiz Fernando Rocha Luz; SILVA JUNIOR, Revaldo Afonso; XAVIER, João Henrique Meneses; GUERRA, Juliano Bernadelli. Treatment of Congenital Clubfoot with the Ponseti Method: A Case Series in Pediatric Patients: Treatment of Congenital Clubfoot with the Ponseti Method: A Case Series in Pediatric Patients. Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal The Knowledge, Brasil, v. 1, n. 1, 2026. DOI: 10.51473/rcmos.v1i1.2026.2233. Disponível em: https://submissoesrevistarcmos.com.br/rcmos/article/view/2233. Acesso em: 15 apr. 2026.