Precedents and Statutory Law: A Critique of the Brazilian Legal System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i2.2025.1476Palavras-chave:
Common Law, Civil Law, Stare DecisisResumo
This paper examines the challenges of transferring legal institutions between the common law and civil law traditions, with a focus on the application of precedent analysis within the Brazilian legal system. It argues that while both traditions utilize elements of Roman law, their distinct historical development and social constructions lead to fundamentally different approaches to legal reasoning. The paper examines the fundamental characteristics of common law, highlighting the doctrine of stare decisis and the practice of distinguishing, while contrasting these with the civil law tradition's emphasis on codified law and the persuasive, rather than binding, nature of precedent. The increasing trend of "staturification" in common law systems and the limitations of applying stare decisis in civil law contexts are discussed. Ultimately, the paper concludes that the complexities of each system, rooted in unique societal experiences, necessitate careful consideration of these differences when attempting institutional exchange, highlighting the potential risks of disregarding these fundamental distinctions.
Downloads
Referências
ABBOUD, Georges. Introdução à teoria e à filosofia do direito. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2013.
ALEXANDER, Larry. Sherwin, Emily. Judges as Rule Makers. Common Law Theory - Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Law. Cambridge, UK. P 27-51, 2008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511551116.002
ALGERO, Mary Garvey. Sources of Law and the Value of Precedent: A Comparative and Empirical Study of a Civil Law State in a Common Law Nation, The. Louisiana Law Review. New Orleans, USA, v. 65, n. 2, p. 775-822, 2005.
GOODMAN, Ellen. The Origins of the Western Legal Tradition: from Thales to the Tudors. Sidney: The Federation Press, 1995.
KIMBROUGH, Steven Orla. On the Use of Likelihood as a Guide to Truth. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. Vol. 1980, Olume One: Contributed Papers (1980), pp. 117-128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1980.1.192558
LAMOND, Grant. Do precedents create rules? Legal Theory, Cambridge, UK, v. 11, n. 01, p. 1-26, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325205050019
LONDREGAN, John. Common Law vs. The Civil Code: Precedent and Predictability. Princeton: Princeton University, 2002. (Mimeo).
SCALIA, Antonin. Common-law courts in a civil-law system: The role of United States federal courts in interpreting the Constitution and laws. Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Cambridge, USA, v. 18, p. 77-122, 1997.
SCHAUER, Frederick. Precedent. Stanford Law Review, Stanford, USA, v. 39, p. 571-605, 1987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1228760
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Categorias
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Haroldo Domingos Bertoni Filho (Autor)
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0). Isso significa que você tem a liberdade de:
- Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer meio ou formato.
- Adaptar — remixar, transformar e construir sobre o material para qualquer propósito, inclusive comercial.
O uso deste material está condicionado à atribuição apropriada ao(s) autor(es) original(is), fornecendo um link para a licença, e indicando se foram feitas alterações. A licença não exige permissão do autor ou da editora, desde que seguidas estas condições.
A logomarca da licença Creative Commons é exibida de maneira permanente no rodapé da revista.
Os direitos autorais do manuscrito podem ser retidos pelos autores sem restrições e solicitados a qualquer momento, mesmo após a publicação na revista.
