Rational evaluation of evidence in brazilian criminal procedure
Rational evaluation of evidence in brazilian criminal procedure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i1.2025.1059Keywords:
Valuation of evidence; Criminal proceedings; Fundamental rights.Abstract
Introduction: The rational valuation of evidence in brazilian criminal proceedings is an indispensable element to ensure that judicial decisions are fair, implicit and duly substantiated. This practice ensures the protection of the rights of all parties involved, promoting fairness in the trial and avoiding arbitrariness in the judicial system. Objective: The general objective of this work is to analyze in detail the main theoretical, doctrinal and jurisprudential foundations that guide the process of valuation of evidence in Brazilian criminal law, with emphasis on essential constitutional principles, such as the presumption of innocence the free motivated conviction and the rational persuasion of the judge. Methodology: The study is based on an open literature review, including renowned authors in the area of criminal proceedings, as well as a careful analysis of national jurisprudence.The main focus is to examine relevant decisions of the Supreme Court (STF) and the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), which shape the application of the principles in practice. Results: The results indicate that the correct application of the principles is fundamental for the protection of the fundamental rights of the defendants, preventing unjust convictions and ensuring equity and integration of criminal proceedings.However, challenges such as subjectivity in witness evidence and the increasing complexity of digital evidence still represent significant barriers to the full effectiveness of guarantees. Discussion: The discussion focuses on the need to improve the legal and technical guidelines for the valuation of evidence, in order to promote greater legal certainty and uniformity in judicial decisions. These best ones are essential in the face of the new demands brought by technology and the evolution of modern crimes. Conclusion: It is concluded that the continuous and specialized training of legal operators, combined with the creation of clear protocols for the analysis of digital and technological evidence, are essential measures for the strengthening and development of the Brazilian criminal justice system, ensuring fairer and more consistent judgments.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm. Acesso em: 26 set. 2024.
BRASIL. Lei nº 12.965, de 23 de abril de 2014. Estabelece princípios, garantias, direitos e deveres para o uso da Internet no Brasil (Marco Civil da Internet). Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2014/lei/l12965.htm. Acesso em: 26 set. 2024.
BRASIL. Código de Processo Penal - Decreto-Lei nº 3.689, de 3 de outubro de 1941. Disponível em: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del3689compilado.htm. Acesso em: 26 set. 2024.
FERRAJOLI, Luigi. Direito e Razão: Teoria do Garantismo Penal. 1. ed. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2010.
LOFTUS, Elizabeth. Memory Distortion and False Memory Creation. Journal of American Psychology, 2003.
LOPES JR., Aury. Direito Processual Penal. 16. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2017.
NUCCI, Guilherme de Souza. Código de Processo Penal Comentado. 14. ed. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2014.
TOURINHO FILHO, Fernando da Costa. Processo Penal. 38. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2017.
BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Habeas Corpus 126.292/SP. Relator: Ministro Teori Zavascki. Disponível em: https://www.stf.jus.br/portal/jurisprudencia/listarJurisprudencia.asp?s1=126.292&base=baseAcordaos. Acesso em: 26 set. 2024.
BRASIL. Superior Tribunal de Justiça. Recurso Especial 1.544.126/RS. Relator: Ministro Sebastião Reis Júnior. Disponível em: https://www.stj.jus.br/sites/portalp/Inicio. Acesso em: 26 set. 2024.
BRASILEIRO, Renato. Manual de Processo Penal: Volume Único. 6. ed. Salvador: Juspodivm, 2020.
BRASILEIRO, Renato. Curso de Processo Penal: Volume 2. 7. ed. Salvador: Juspodivm, 2021.
BADARÓ, Gustavo Henrique. Processo Penal: A conformidade constitucional das normas processuais penais. 4. ed. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2021.
BADARÓ, Gustavo Henrique. Processo Penal: provas, garantias e a função do juiz. 2. ed. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2020.
ZAFFARONI, Eugenio Raúl; PIERANGELI, José Henrique. Manual de Direito Penal Brasileiro: Parte Geral. 8. ed. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2020.
MORAES, Alexandre de. Direito Constitucional. 36. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2020.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bruno Rafael Rodrigues Dias (Autor)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means you are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The use of this material is conditioned upon proper attribution to the original author(s), providing a link to the license, and indicating if changes were made. The license does not require permission from the author or the publisher as long as these conditions are met.
The Creative Commons license logo is displayed permanently in the footer of the journal.
The copyright of the manuscript can be retained by the authors without restrictions and can be requested at any time, even after publication in the journal.
