Análise Sensorial Aplicada ao Serviço de Vinhos: Protocolos de Degustação, Calibração de Equipe e Redução de Variabilidade na Recomendação ao Cliente
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i1.2026.2282Keywords:
Análise sensorial, Serviço de vinhos, Descritores sensoriais, Sommelieria, Calibração de equipe, RestaurantesAbstract
A recomendação de vinhos em restaurantes exige a integração entre a percepção sensorial, o domínio técnico, a leitura do consumidor, a adequação gastronômica e a comunicação de serviço. Em operações de alimentos e bebidas, a ausência de vocabulário comum, de rotinas de degustação e de calibração periódica favorece descrições inconsistentes entre os atendentes, reduz a confiança do cliente e compromete a experiência de consumo. A análise sensorial oferece instrumentos metodológicos capazes de organizar a percepção, reduzir subjetividades excessivas e transformar atributos visuais, olfativos, gustativos e táteis em critérios operacionais para recomendação. Com base em revisão bibliográfica sobre avaliação sensorial de vinhos, descritores, tipicidade, comportamento do consumidor e influência de fatores extrínsecos, discute-se a aplicação de protocolos sensoriais ao serviço de vinhos em restaurantes. A análise evidencia que fichas estruturadas, léxico controlado, provas comparativas, calibração da equipe, reconhecimento de defeitos e tradução técnica em linguagem acessível podem reduzir a variabilidade entre avaliadores e fortalecer a recomendação consultiva. Conclui-se que a análise sensorial, quando adaptada à rotina do salão, qualifica a experiência do cliente sem eliminar a dimensão relacional da hospitalidade.
Downloads
References
ALMENBERG, Johan; DREBER, Anna. When does the price affect the taste? Results from a wine experiment. Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge, v. 6, n. 1, p. 111–121, 2011. DOI: 10.1017/S1931436100001085.
BIANCHI, Ivana et al. Non-experts’ understanding of terms frequently used by experts to describe the sensory properties of wine: an investigation based on opposites. Food Quality and Preference, Amsterdam, v. 92, p. 104215, 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104215.
BROCHET, Frédéric; DUBOURDIEU, Denis. Wine descriptive language supports cognitive specificity of chemical senses. Brain and Language, Amsterdam, v. 77, n. 2, p. 187–196, 2001. DOI: 10.1006/brln.2000.2428.
CHARTERS, Steve; PETTIGREW, Simone. The dimensions of wine quality. Food Quality and Preference, Amsterdam, v. 18, n. 7, p. 997–1007, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.04.003.
CORSI, Armando Maria et al. Testing lexical equivalences for wine flavors in emerging markets: do hawthorns taste like blackberries? Food Quality and Preference, Amsterdam, v. 62, p. 296–306, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.03.011.
DELIZA, Rosires; MACFIE, Hal. The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: a review. Journal of Sensory Studies, Hoboken, v. 11, n. 2, p. 103–128, 1996. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1996.tb00036.x.
GAWEL, Richard; OBERHOLSTER, Anita; FRANCIS, I. Leigh. A mouth-feel wheel: terminology for communicating the mouth-feel characteristics of red wine. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, Adelaide, v. 6, n. 3, p. 203–207, 2000. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2000.tb00180.x.
GOLDSTEIN, Robin et al. Do more expensive wines taste better? Evidence from a large sample of blind tastings. Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1–9, 2008. DOI: 10.1017/S1931436100000523.
HOPFER, Helene; HEYMANN, Hildegarde. Judging wine quality: do we need experts, consumers, or trained panelists? Food Quality and Preference, Amsterdam, v. 32, p. 221–233, 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.10.004.
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. ISO 4120:2021: sensory analysis — methodology — triangle test. Geneva: ISO, 2021.
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. ISO 5492:2008: sensory analysis — vocabulary. Geneva: ISO, 2008.
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. ISO 8586:2023: sensory analysis — selection and training of sensory assessors. Geneva: ISO, 2023.
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. ISO 13299:2016: sensory analysis — methodology — general guidance for establishing a sensory profile. Geneva: ISO, 2016.
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF VINE AND WINE. Review of the document on sensory analysis of wine. Paris: OIV, 2015.
JACKSON, Ronald S. Wine tasting: a professional handbook. 4. ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2022.
LAWLESS, Harry T.; HEYMANN, Hildegarde. Sensory evaluation of food: principles and practices. 2. ed. New York: Springer, 2010.
LESSCHAEVE, Isabelle. Sensory evaluation of wine and commercial realities: review of current practices and perspectives. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, Davis, v. 58, n. 2, p. 252–258, 2007.
LOCKSHIN, Larry; CORSI, Armando Maria. Consumer behavior for wine 2.0: a review since 2003 and future directions. Wine Economics and Policy, Amsterdam, v. 1, n. 1, p. 2–23, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.wep.2012.11.003.
NOBLE, Ann C. et al. Modification of a standardized system of wine aroma terminology. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, Davis, v. 38, n. 2, p. 143–146, 1987. DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1987.38.2.143.
ORTEGA-HERAS, Miriam et al. Generation of wine sensory descriptors by a one-step method based on free profile and their use to establish the typicity of PDO wines. LWT – Food Science and Technology, Amsterdam, v. 203, p. 116410, 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116410.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dalison Santos (Autor)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

