COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF OPEN SURGERYANDLAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR FOR PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i1.2024.598Keywords:
Complications. Laparoscopy. Prevention. Prognosis. Rehabilitation.Abstract
This study conducts a systematic review comparing open surgery and laparoscopic repair
techniques for perforated peptic ulcer. The research was performed using PubMed and
ScienceDirect databases, covering studies published in the last five years. Nine articles
directly comparing the two surgical techniques were included, evaluating factors such as
hospitalization time, postoperative complications, wound healing time, and infection rates.
The results suggest that laparoscopic surgery offers several advantages, including reduced
hospital stay and faster recovery, while open surgery remains relevant in specific cases. The
analysis highlights the importance of selecting the surgical technique based on the patient's
clinical condition and the surgeon's expertise, with laparoscopy emerging as the preferred
approach in most cases. This study aims to provide evidence that can guide surgical practice,
promoting better outcomes and a more patient-centered approach to the management of
perforated peptic ulcers.
Downloads
References
AHMED, M et al. Risk factors influencing postoperative outcome in patients with perforated peptic ulcer: a prospective cohort study. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, p. 1-6, 2022.
BEJIGA, G; NEGASA, Tolera; ABEBE, A. Treatment outcome of perforated peptic ulcer disease among surgically treated patients: A cross-sectional study in Adama hospital medical college, Adama, Ethiopia. International Journal of Surgery Open, v. 48, p. 100564, 2022.
COSTA, G et al. Laparoscopic Treatment of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Interrupted Stitches Repair versus Knotless Barbed Suture. Journal of Clinical Medicine, v. 13, n. 5, p. 1242, 2024.
DEMETRIOU, G; CHAPMAN, Mark. Primary closure versus Graham patch omentopexy in perforated peptic ulcer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Surgeon, v. 20, n. 3, p. e61-e67, 2022.
ERTEKIN, S Caglar et al. Laparoscopic repair versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcers: quality of life assessment. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2024.
ODISHO, T et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic modified Cellan-Jones repair versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer at a community hospital. Surgical Endoscopy, v. 37, n. 1, p. 715-722, 2023.
PAN, C-W et al. Simple laparoscopic repair of a perforated peptic ulcer without omental patch. Asian Journal of Surgery, v. 43, n. 1, p. 311-314, 2020.
PELLONI, M et al. Comparative study of postoperative complications after open and laparoscopic surgery of the perforated peptic ulcer: Advantages of the aparoscopic approach. Asian Journal of Surgery, v. 45, n. 4, p. 1007-1013, 2022.
SALMAN, M A et al. Surgical management of perforated peptic ulcer: a comparative meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open surgery. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, v. 32, n. 5, p. 586-594, 2022.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mateus Manzan, Artur Carvalho Diamante, Enzo Assunção de Assis Santos, Guilherme Starling Moss, Luiza Bitarães Amorim (Autor/in)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). This means you are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The use of this material is conditioned upon proper attribution to the original author(s), providing a link to the license, and indicating if changes were made. The license does not require permission from the author or the publisher as long as these conditions are met.
The Creative Commons license logo is displayed permanently in the footer of the journal.
The copyright of the manuscript can be retained by the authors without restrictions and can be requested at any time, even after publication in the journal.
How to Cite
