Judicial control of public policies in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Federal Court: limits and possibilities
Judicial control of public policies in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Federal Court: limits and possibilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i2.2025.1353Keywords:
Judicial Oversight. Public Policies. Federal Supreme Court. Separation of Powers. Existential Minimum.Abstract
This article analyzes the complex and evolving jurisprudence of the Federal Supreme Court (STF) regarding judicial oversight of public policies. It examines the transition from an initial stance of judicial self-restraint to a more interventionist approach, especially in the implementation of social rights. The objective is to provide an overview of how the Brazilian Supreme Court has navigated the delicate task of protecting the Constitution without becoming a positive legislator or public administrator.
Downloads
References
BARROSO, L. R. O controle de constitucionalidade no direito brasileiro. 7. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2016.
BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Brasília, DF: Senado Federal, 1988.
SARMENTO, D. Direitos fundamentais e relações privadas. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2006.
SILVA, V. A. da. O proporcional e o razoável. Revista dos Tribunais, v. 798, p. 23-50, abr. 2002.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Vinicius Lima Duarte (Autor)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.