Judicial control of public policies in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Federal Court: limits and possibilities

Judicial control of public policies in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Federal Court: limits and possibilities

Authors

  • Vinicius Lima Duarte Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i2.2025.1353

Keywords:

Judicial Oversight. Public Policies. Federal Supreme Court. Separation of Powers. Existential Minimum.

Abstract

This article analyzes the complex and evolving jurisprudence of the Federal Supreme Court (STF) regarding judicial oversight of public policies. It examines the transition from an initial stance of judicial self-restraint to a more interventionist approach, especially in the implementation of social rights. The objective is to provide an overview of how the Brazilian Supreme Court has navigated the delicate task of protecting the Constitution without becoming a positive legislator or public administrator.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Vinicius Lima Duarte

    Procurador do Município de Porto Alegre/RS. 

References

BARROSO, L. R. O controle de constitucionalidade no direito brasileiro. 7. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2016.

BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Brasília, DF: Senado Federal, 1988.

SARMENTO, D. Direitos fundamentais e relações privadas. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, 2006.

SILVA, V. A. da. O proporcional e o razoável. Revista dos Tribunais, v. 798, p. 23-50, abr. 2002.

Published

2025-09-08

How to Cite

DUARTE, Vinicius Lima. Judicial control of public policies in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Federal Court: limits and possibilities: Judicial control of public policies in the jurisprudence of the Supreme Federal Court: limits and possibilities. Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal The Knowledge, Brasil, v. 1, n. 2, 2025. DOI: 10.51473/rcmos.v1i2.2025.1353. Disponível em: https://submissoesrevistarcmos.com.br/rcmos/article/view/1353. Acesso em: 10 sep. 2025.