Practices in Fiscal Education and Tax Compliance: Lessons from Brazil Applicable to the United States
Practices in Fiscal Education and Tax Compliance: Lessons from Brazil Applicable to the United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i1.2025.1773Keywords:
Tax Education; Fiscal Citizenship; Tax Compliance; PNEF; IRS; VITA/TAS.Abstract
This article offers a comparative analysis of Fiscal Education and tax compliance models in Brazil and the United States, examining how each country mobilizes citizenship, service delivery, and rights protection to strengthen institutional legitimacy. In Brazil, the National Fiscal Education Program (PNEF) promotes a civic-oriented approach that links taxation to social control, transparency, and public participation. Despite its normative robustness, the Brazilian model still faces cognitive barriers, as public materials often lack explicit standards of proof, making it difficult for citizens to understand how evidence supports fiscal decisions. In the United States, by contrast, the dominant model prioritizes usability and taxpayer assistance. Through the integrated ecosystem of IRS, VITA/TCE, and TAS, the system seeks to reduce compliance costs, provide first-contact resolution, and ensure institutional mediation when failures occur. However, the technical nature of these communications tends to target an elite audience rather than the public. The comparative analysis shows that both systems converge on the need for verifiable information, accessible mechanisms of redress, and structured feedback loops that support institutional learning. Ultimately, the study argues that integrating critical education, service design, and disciplined proof — combined with participation that generates observable effects — enhances legitimacy and promotes more stable and voluntary tax compliance.
Downloads
References
BRASIL. Ministério da Fazenda. Programa Nacional de Educação Fiscal (PNEF): cadernos, diretrizes e materiais de apoio (2017–2023). Brasília: ENAP/ESAF, 2023.
CIAT – Centro Interamericano de Administrações Tributárias. Publicações técnicas sobre serviços ao contribuinte e gestão da administração tributária. Cidade do Panamá: CIAT, 2022.
ENTMAN, R. M. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, v. 43, n. 4, p. 51–58, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
FAIRCLOUGH, N. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078
FAIRCLOUGH, Norman. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press; Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1992.
KIRCHLER, E. The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628238
KIRCHLER, E.; HOELZL, E.; WAHL, I. Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, v. 29, n. 2, p. 210–225, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004
LUTTMER, E. F. P.; SINGHAL, M. Tax Morale. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 28, n. 4, p. 149–168, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.4.149
OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Tax Morale: What Drives People and Businesses to Pay Tax? Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.
OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Tax Administration 2021: Comparative Information on OECD and Other Advanced and Emerging Economies. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2021.
OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Tax Administration 2023: Comparative Information on OECD and Other Advanced and Emerging Economies. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023.
OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Behavioural Insights and Public Policy: Lessons from Around the World. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017.
PERELMAN, Chaïm; OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, Lucie. Tratado da argumentação: a nova retórica. 2. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2005.
ROTHSTEIN, B.; TEORELL, J. What is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government. Governance, v. 21, n. 2, p. 165–190, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x
SUCHMAN, M. C. Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, v. 20, n. 3, p. 571–610, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
TOULMIN, S. The Uses of Argument. Updated ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005
UNITED STATES. Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Strategic Operating Plan, FY2023–2031. Washington, DC: IRS, 2023.
UNITED STATES. Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Publication 1 – Your Rights as a Taxpayer (Taxpayer Bill of Rights). Washington, DC: IRS, s.d. (mantido por ser a única data possível)
UNITED STATES. Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS). Annual Report to Congress (edição mais recente). Washington, DC: TAS, 2023.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ismael Andrade Santos (Autor)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




