Practices in Fiscal Education and Tax Compliance: Lessons from Brazil Applicable to the United States

Practices in Fiscal Education and Tax Compliance: Lessons from Brazil Applicable to the United States

Authors

  • Ismael Andrade Santos UERJ Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i1.2025.1773

Keywords:

Tax Education; Fiscal Citizenship; Tax Compliance; PNEF; IRS; VITA/TAS.

Abstract

This article offers a comparative analysis of Fiscal Education and tax compliance models in Brazil and the United States, examining how each country mobilizes citizenship, service delivery, and rights protection to strengthen institutional legitimacy. In Brazil, the National Fiscal Education Program (PNEF) promotes a civic-oriented approach that links taxation to social control, transparency, and public participation. Despite its normative robustness, the Brazilian model still faces cognitive barriers, as public materials often lack explicit standards of proof, making it difficult for citizens to understand how evidence supports fiscal decisions. In the United States, by contrast, the dominant model prioritizes usability and taxpayer assistance. Through the integrated ecosystem of IRS, VITA/TCE, and TAS, the system seeks to reduce compliance costs, provide first-contact resolution, and ensure institutional mediation when failures occur. However, the technical nature of these communications tends to target an elite audience rather than the public. The comparative analysis shows that both systems converge on the need for verifiable information, accessible mechanisms of redress, and structured feedback loops that support institutional learning. Ultimately, the study argues that integrating critical education, service design, and disciplined proof — combined with participation that generates observable effects — enhances legitimacy and promotes more stable and voluntary tax compliance. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ismael Andrade Santos, UERJ

    Mestre em Linguística pela Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) 

References

BRASIL. Ministério da Fazenda. Programa Nacional de Educação Fiscal (PNEF): cadernos, diretrizes e materiais de apoio (2017–2023). Brasília: ENAP/ESAF, 2023.

CIAT – Centro Interamericano de Administrações Tributárias. Publicações técnicas sobre serviços ao contribuinte e gestão da administração tributária. Cidade do Panamá: CIAT, 2022.

ENTMAN, R. M. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, v. 43, n. 4, p. 51–58, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x

FAIRCLOUGH, N. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078

FAIRCLOUGH, Norman. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press; Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1992.

KIRCHLER, E. The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628238

KIRCHLER, E.; HOELZL, E.; WAHL, I. Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, v. 29, n. 2, p. 210–225, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004

LUTTMER, E. F. P.; SINGHAL, M. Tax Morale. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 28, n. 4, p. 149–168, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.4.149

OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Tax Morale: What Drives People and Businesses to Pay Tax? Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.

OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Tax Administration 2021: Comparative Information on OECD and Other Advanced and Emerging Economies. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2021.

OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Tax Administration 2023: Comparative Information on OECD and Other Advanced and Emerging Economies. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023.

OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Behavioural Insights and Public Policy: Lessons from Around the World. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017.

PERELMAN, Chaïm; OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, Lucie. Tratado da argumentação: a nova retórica. 2. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2005.

ROTHSTEIN, B.; TEORELL, J. What is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government. Governance, v. 21, n. 2, p. 165–190, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x

SUCHMAN, M. C. Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, v. 20, n. 3, p. 571–610, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258788

TOULMIN, S. The Uses of Argument. Updated ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005

UNITED STATES. Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Strategic Operating Plan, FY2023–2031. Washington, DC: IRS, 2023.

UNITED STATES. Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Publication 1 – Your Rights as a Taxpayer (Taxpayer Bill of Rights). Washington, DC: IRS, s.d. (mantido por ser a única data possível)

UNITED STATES. Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS). Annual Report to Congress (edição mais recente). Washington, DC: TAS, 2023.

Published

2025-02-11

How to Cite

SANTOS, Ismael Andrade. Practices in Fiscal Education and Tax Compliance: Lessons from Brazil Applicable to the United States: Practices in Fiscal Education and Tax Compliance: Lessons from Brazil Applicable to the United States. Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal The Knowledge, Brasil, v. 1, n. 1, 2025. DOI: 10.51473/rcmos.v1i1.2025.1773. Disponível em: https://submissoesrevistarcmos.com.br/rcmos/article/view/1773. Acesso em: 4 dec. 2025.