Governance of Large-Scale Land Regularization Programs: An Integrated Framework between Engineering, Urban Planning, and Stakeholder Management

Governance of Large-Scale Land Regularization Programs: An Integrated Framework between Engineering, Urban Planning, and Stakeholder Management

Authors

  • Luciane Tenório Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i1.2026.2070

Keywords:

land regularization, governance, PMO

Abstract

Large-scale land regularization programs often fail less due to technical limitations and more due to fragmentation across engineering/infrastructure, urban planning, and stakeholder management. This fragmentation drives inconsistent data, rework, late decisions on risk and environmental constraints, disputes with utilities, and unstable land-registration interfaces, increasing cost, lead time, and litigation. This paper proposes an end-to-end “field-to-registry” operational governance framework built on six integrated pillars: decision architecture, program PMO, traceable data governance, contract/supervision with acceptance criteria, technical–urban–environmental compliance, and stakeholder/conflict protocols. Auditable mechanisms include quality gates, version control and chain of custody, decision logs, and active risk management, supported by a nonconformity protocol (identify, record, decide, correct, validate). The paper outlines verifiable performance metrics (cycle time, rework, first-pass yield, backlog, compliance) and a 90-day implementation roadmap for scaling. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANSELL, C.; GASH, A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 18, n. 4, p. 543–571, 2008. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum032.

BABBIE, E. The practice of social research. 14. ed. Boston: Cengage, 2016.

BRYSON, J. M. What to do when stakeholders matter: stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, v. 6, n. 1, p. 21–53, 2004. DOI: 10.1080/14719030410001675722.

DALE, P.; McLAUGHLIN, J. Land administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

DEININGER, K.; SELOD, H.; BURNS, A. The land governance assessment framework: identifying and monitoring good practice in the land sector. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012. DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-8758-0.

EMERSON, K.; NABATCHI, T.; BALOGH, S. An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, v. 22, n. 1, p. 1–29, 2012. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mur011.

ENEMARK, S. Understanding the concept of Fit-for-Purpose Land Administration in support of the Post 2015 global agenda. In: FIG WORKING WEEK 2015, 17–21 May 2015, Sofia. Proceedings… Copenhagen: International Federation of Surveyors (FIG), 2015.

ENEMARK, S.; BELL, K. C.; LEMMEN, C.; McLAREN, R. Fit-for-purpose land administration. Copenhagen: International Federation of Surveyors (FIG), 2014. (FIG Publication No. 60. Joint FIG/World Bank publication).

FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS (FAO). Voluntary guidelines on the responsible governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests in the context of national food security (VGGT). Rome: FAO, 2012.

FREEMAN, R. E. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman, 1984.

GIL, A. C. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 7. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2019.

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. ISO 9001:2015 — Quality management systems — Requirements. Geneva: ISO, 2015.

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. ISO 31000:2018 — Risk management — Guidelines. Geneva: ISO, 2018.

KOOIMAN, J. (ed.). Governing as governance. London: Sage, 2003.

LEMMEN, C. H. J. A domain model for land administration. Delft: ITC, 2012.

LOCKE, J. Second treatise of government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. Original publicado em 1690.

MINTZBERG, H. Structure in fives: designing effective organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1983.

MORONI, S. The just city. Three background issues: institutional justice and spatial justice, social justice and distributive justice, concept of justice and conceptions of justice. Planning Theory, v. 19, n. 3, p. 251–267, 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1473095219877670.

NORTH, D. C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). Stakeholder engagement for inclusive water governance. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015.

ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). Open government: the global context and the way forward. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2016.

OSTROM, E. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

PRESSMAN, J.; WILDAVSKY, A. Implementation. 3. ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.

PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE (PMI). The standard for program management. 5. ed. Newtown Square, PA: PMI, 2024.

RAJABIFARD, A.; WILLIAMSON, I. P. Spatial data infrastructures: concept, SDI hierarchy and future directions. In: GEOMATICS’80 CONFERENCE, 2001, Tehran. Proceedings… Tehran: [s.n.], 2001. p. 9–24.

SUCHMAN, M. C. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, v. 20, n. 3, p. 571–610, 1995. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331.

UNITED NATIONS HUMAN SETTLEMENTS PROGRAMME (UN-HABITAT). The new urban agenda. Quito: United Nations, 2017.

UNITED NATIONS HUMAN SETTLEMENTS PROGRAMME (UN-HABITAT); GLOBAL LAND TOOL NETWORK (GLTN). Fit-for-purpose land administration: guiding principles for country implementation. Nairobi: UN-Habitat/GLTN, 2016.

UNITED NATIONS. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: United Nations, 2015.

WILLIAMSON, I.; ENEMARK, S.; WALLACE, J.; RAJABIFARD, A. Land administration for sustainable development. Redlands: ESRI Press, 2010.

WORLD BANK. World development report 2004: making services work for poor people. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2004.

WORLD BANK. Urban land markets: improving land management for successful urbanization. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2015.

WORLD BANK. Doing business 2019: training for reform. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2019.

WORLD BANK. Land Governance Assessment Framework (LGAF): implementation manual for assessing governance in the land sector. Version October 2013. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2013.

Published

2026-02-19

How to Cite

TENÓRIO , Luciane. Governance of Large-Scale Land Regularization Programs: An Integrated Framework between Engineering, Urban Planning, and Stakeholder Management: Governance of Large-Scale Land Regularization Programs: An Integrated Framework between Engineering, Urban Planning, and Stakeholder Management. Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal The Knowledge, Brasil, v. 1, n. 1, 2026. DOI: 10.51473/rcmos.v1i1.2026.2070. Disponível em: https://submissoesrevistarcmos.com.br/rcmos/article/view/2070. Acesso em: 19 feb. 2026.