Therapeutic Options for Melioidosis: A Systematic Review

Therapeutic Options for Melioidosis: A Systematic Review

Authors

  • Herlice do Nascimento Herlice do Nascimento Veras UECE Author
  • Kátia Thamiris dos Santos Lima UECE   Author
  • Sarah Aragão Carvalho UNINTA Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i1.2026.2042

Keywords:

melioidosis, Burkholderia pseudomallei, Treatment

Abstract

Introduction: Melioidosis is a disease caused by the bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei, common in tropical regions. It is poorly understood and studied by health professionals, but some antibiotics reduce mortality from infection by 50%. Method: This review aimed to evaluate the quality of the literature on basic information characteristic of melioidosis by comparing the diagnostic methods and medications used according to the PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria were individuals infected with the bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei, and the exclusion criteria were individuals under 3 years of age and over 70 years of age. Results: Immunochromatography assay results were insensitive. PCR use can reduce the time to a definitive diagnosis by up to 36 hours. API 20NE and 20E identified 98% and 99% of B. pseudomallei isolates, respectively. AKI, advanced age, or DM did not worsen mortality. Treatment with ceftazidime was associated with good activity compared to conventional therapy. In severe sepsis, meropenem resulted in lower mortality than ceftazidime. Hepatic and bacteremic comorbidities had a worse prognosis. Treatment with ceftazidime, meropenem, TMP-SMX plus doxycycline is therapeutic in non-septicemia. Doxycycline alone is not recommended as treatment of choice. Conclusion: Through comparative research, the culture method remains the preferred method for investigation, despite the time it takes to produce results. Regarding treatment, the medication evaluated as first-line is ceftazidime. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BIRYUKOV, SERGEI S. et al. Comparison of homologous and heterologous vaccination strategies for combating disease caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei. Frontiers in Immunology, v. 16, p. 1596265, 2025.

CHAOWAGUL, W. et al. A comparison of chloramphenicol, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and doxycycline with doxycycline alone as maintenance therapy for melioidosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases, v. 29, n. 2, p. 375–380, 1999.

CHENG, A. C. et al. Outcomes of patients with melioidosis treated with meropenem. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, v. 48, n. 5, p. 1763–1765, 2004.

CHETCHOTISAKD, P. et al. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole plus doxycycline as oral eradicative treatment for melioidosis (MERTH): a multicentre, double-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, v. 383, n. 9919, p. 807–814, 2014.

DESAKORN, V. et al. Detection of Pseudomonas pseudomallei antigen in urine for the diagnosis of melioidosis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, v. 51, n. 5, p. 627–633, 1994.

INGLIS, T. J. J. et al. Comparison of diagnostic laboratory methods for identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, v. 43, n. 5, p. 2201–2206, 2005.

KUNAKORN, M. et al. Comparison of three PCR primer sets for diagnosis of septicemic melioidosis. Acta Tropica, v. 74, n. 2–3, p. 247–251, 2000.

LOWE, P.; ENGLER, C.; NORTON, R. Comparison of automated and nonautomated systems for identification of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, v. 40, n. 12, p. 4625–4627, 2002.

SENGYEE, SINEENART et al. Melioidosis vaccines: recent advances and future directions. Frontiers in Immunology, v. 16, p. 1582113, 2025.

SETTLES, ERIK W. et al. Development and evaluation of a multiplex serodiagnostic bead assay (BurkPx) for accurate melioidosis diagnosis. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, v. 17, n. 2, p. e0011072, 2023.

SIMPSON, A. J. H. et al. Differential antibiotic-induced endotoxin release in severe melioidosis. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, v. 181, n. 3, p. 1014–1019, 2000.

SIMPSON, A. J. et al. A comparison of lysis centrifugation, pour plate, and conventional blood culture methods in the diagnosis of septicaemic melioidosis. Journal of Clinical Pathology, v. 52, n. 8, p. 616–619, 1999.

SIRISINHA, S. et al. Recent developments in laboratory diagnosis of melioidosis. Acta Tropica, v. 74, n. 2–3, p. 235–245, 2000.

SUNTORNSUT, P. et al. Effectiveness of a multifaceted prevention programme for melioidosis in diabetics (PREMEL): a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, v. 15, n. 6, p. e0009060, 2021.

SUPUTTAMONGKOL, Y. et al. Ceftazidime vs. amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of severe melioidosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases, v. 19, n. 5, p. 846–853, 1994.

WAJANAROGANA, S. et al. Potential of recombinant flagellin fragment from Burkholderia thailandensis as an antigen for melioidosis antibody detection by indirect ELISA. Molecular and Cellular Probes, v. 27, n. 2, p. 98–102, 2013.

WHITE, N. J. et al. Halving of mortality of severe melioidosis by ceftazidime. The Lancet, v. 334, n. 8665, p. 697–701, 1989.

Published

2026-02-11

How to Cite

HERLICE DO NASCIMENTO VERAS, Herlice do Nascimento; LIMA, Kátia Thamiris dos Santos; CARVALHO, Sarah Aragão. Therapeutic Options for Melioidosis: A Systematic Review: Therapeutic Options for Melioidosis: A Systematic Review. Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal The Knowledge, Brasil, v. 1, n. 1, 2026. DOI: 10.51473/rcmos.v1i1.2026.2042. Disponível em: https://submissoesrevistarcmos.com.br/rcmos/article/view/2042. Acesso em: 11 feb. 2026.